First Stop 4 Home Loans

This is a common question now that rates have fallen to the lowest levels in well over 40 years.  This means you can get, as of today, rates around 4.5% for a 30-year fixed rate — WOW!  It would appear that everyone who has a mortgage should refinance because if you can get a lower rate, why wouldn’t you?  In some instances, I would agree; but, the answer is in the numbers.

Currently, I am telling all clients that there will be NO reason for them to refinance.  It won’t make financial sense; their rate is just too low.  As a homeowner, you may get solicitations to refinance because mortgages are public record.  Thing is, the lender doesn’t know your specifics, nor do they have your best interest in mind.  My current clients, from the last year or so,  know I won’t call them to refinance since I DO care whether they do the right thing.

So when does it make sense?  One general rule of thumb is the new rate should be more than 1% lower than your current rate.  This isn’t true for all people though.  If what you owe is less than $150,000, you may need the rate to be closer to 1 1/2% – 2% lower.  And if your loan is less than $100,000, I would say it almost never makes sense to refinance.  You’re better off making principal payments.

Why though?  Since you’re taking out a new loan, you will have origination charges along with all the fees involved with a new loan — title company fees, setting up your escrow account and county fees.  Sure, you may hear that there are no closing cost refinances, but I am here to say nothing is free.  Your charges are either added to your loan, covered with a higher interest rate or being paid out of pocket by you or a combination thereof.  It’s time to run numbers!

To get a true sense if a refinance is a sound financial decision, you’ll want to gather the following information:

• approximate value of your home (tax assessed values are actually higher than current values)
• your current loan balance(s) on any first, second or home equity lines of credit
• your current loan rate(s)
• annual property taxes
• annual homeowner’s insurance if a single family home
• current principal and interest payment
• your goals — reduce rate, take cash out, etc.
• type of loan, i.e. fixed rate, term or ARM
• occupancy of the home, i.e. owner occupied, second home or investment property

These will enable me to run figures and determine the “payback” time frame.  I recently had a past client do a refinance.  They were saving $200/month.  That’s a lot of money!  Their costs were about $4400 which covered lender fees, title charges and county charges.  Setting up the escrow is not figured into this equation.  Escrows are pre-paid expenses that cover future payments of taxes and insurance.  My client would pay for these regardless of refinancing or not. 

Anyway, the calculation I run is based on the savings per year – $2400 – divided by the costs of $4400.  He’s going to re-coup these fees in 1.8 years, so under two.  This is the second rule of thumb.  If it takes longer than two years to recoup the costs, then refinancing may not be the right move.  Now, going to a shorter term or going from an Adjustable Rate Mortgage (ARM) to a fixed may make sense even if the time-frame to recoup is higher.  Biggest question here … how long will you be in the home?  Though we never really know the answer, it will certainly help guide the financial soundness of the refinance.

For those of you with second loans or home values close to or  than what you owe, refinancing may just NOT be an option, regardless of the savings.  Long and short — “maybe” is the answer to the title question.  It’s not right for everyone.  And when you work with me, I will make sure you know whether it’s right for you or not.  I would rather give you the straight scoop than have you upset that you did something you should not have.  

Send me the answers to the bulleted items above.  Let’s see if refinancing IS right for you!!

Can you say “whoopee?” 

Late Wednesday night (June 30th), the Senate took the lead of the House of Representatives and passed the Homebuyer Assistance and Improvement Act which extends the CLOSING date for those eligible to receive the federal tax credit under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.  This is part of the bill that was presented.  You can see other details of this bill here.

First time buyers, those who haven’t owned a home in the last three years, as well as current owners who have owned a primary residency 5 of the last 8 years, were eligible for a tax credit if they purchased a primary residence — up to $8000 or $6500 respectively.  The guidelines required buyers to have a signed purchase by April 30th and CLOSE on the home by June 3oth.

The problem was that many of these home purchases were being held up buy a multitude of things — the banks that own the homes, the banks that are considering a short sale for the sellers and even title and mortgage companies.  The argument was that the buyer was not at fault for this delay if they had the signed agreement by April 30th so they shouldn’t be penalized.  Low and behold, buyers now have until September 30th to close on their house to still get the federal tax credit!!

So, if you are one of those people that thought you missed out on the credit because something was preventing you from closing on your home prior to June 30th, yesterday, then you can breathe a sigh of relief!  Good luck with your process and enjoy this awesome gift from the government!

Is this house-hunting thing making you feel a little unraveled?  With all the homes on the market, people telling you to “buy now” and the overwhelming amounts of information about programs — who can blame you for not keeping it together!  Okay, so maybe do have this process all figured out.  I commend you for doing some homework and getting educated.

Let’s start with what you need to do BEFORE you start househunting — get pre-approved with a reputable and reliable lender.  A pre-approval means you’ve completed an application with a lender, had credit pulled, provided supporting documentation and your loan has been through an automated underwriting system and/or been seen by an underwriter.  If these things DON’T happen, you’re NOT pre-approved.  There are many things that the lender looks at when determining your qualifications. 

In order to determine the accuracy of your application, we must gather supporting documentation — hence, having you “pull it together”.  The list applies to anyone on the loan application and not all items on this list will pertain to everyone. 

-most recent TWO paystubs

-last TWO years W2s*

-last TWO years federal taxes, all schedules*

-most recent month bank statement, showing beginning and ending balance, all pages

-most recent quarterly statement for any accounts not monthly, i.e. retirement, stocks or bonds, all pages

-any court papers such as decrees or bankruptcy documentation

*If you intend on using a first time buyer program, you will need the last THREE years W2s and federal taxes.  This proves to us and the first time buyer powers-that-be  that you have not owned a home in the last 3 years which is the criteria to be considered a first time buyer.

I know what you’re thinking … along the way I may ask for more, including your first born, right?  People have stories and some are quite good.  My goal is to get everything I need upfront so there aren’t last minute dashes to find other paperwork.  Also, if other things enter your situation for buying, we need to address them with … more paperwork, i.e. a gift from family or document a large deposit into your account.  If you want to avoid some of the pitfalls that can cause havoc in your loan process, check out this great article written by my manager.  She makes a very boring thing, like what not to do while in the process, very funny.

Moral of this story — pull it together to support your application information.  If other documentation is requested, please provide that in a timely manner.  The sooner we have your paperwork, the better.  And before I forget, I am NOT perfect.  I make mistakes and sometimes miss things.  So forgive me if I ask for something you gave/emailed me.  I have so many conversations in a day and receive my share of emails.  I try to keep it all straight, but sometimes, it’s just better to ask again.  No double guessing.   The past few months have been fun as I am working with three ladies that all have the same first name!  Mama Mia!  So, forgive me now.  And most importantly, just know that you WILL be given the best service and communication around.

We just completed another successful first time buyer seminar this past Thursday night.  That was quite the night of storms — thought we might be talking to a small, non-existent audience, but we got lucky and people “weathered” the storm!  I hope you all did too and thanks to those of you who did make the trek!

Every month, on the third Thursday, we perform an exciting light show with music and dance — okay, not really.  But we do present an evening of information so you can learn what you need to know before you get out and look at homes.  Please join us from 6:30-8 pm at the Cornerstone Mortgage office located in Burnsville at 436 Gateway Blvd. 

Steve Howe from Re/Max, and I, will walk you through the homebuying process starting with the first step … pre-approval.  That’s the step of getting your financing set up so you know you can actually purchase a home if you find one.  This is CRUCIAL in today’s market since, as a loan officer, I am seeing changes constantly on what investors are requiring to get a loan.  Come learn what the new changes are and come find out about the special programs you may be eligible for to help you afford your new home.

Steve will explain the home purchasing process and what you can expect from a Realtor.  He makes this process simple and easy to understand; whereas I just confuse you!  Just kidding.  Making sure you’re still reading!  He specializes in in helping first time buyers which is important since your needs are vastly different than a current homeowner.

Anyway, we’d love to have you at the seminar, whether it’s in July or our future classes.  And speaking of classes — this is NOT the Homestretch class that is required to qualify for the first time buyer programs.  You can see this as the Cliff Notes, but with additional information on the special programs that Homestretch doesn’t delve into.

Please RSVP with Cheryl to let us know how many spaces to save.  Can’t wait to meet you!  Oh and one pre-requisite … come with questions!

Every third Thursday of the month we are happy to offer you a free seminar* to learn more about the First Time Homebuyer Process.  Join us on Thursday, the 17th, 6:30-7:30 pm at the Cornerstone Mortgage office located at 436 Gateway Blvd in Burnsville.

From the starting point of getting pre-approved and all that entails to going to closing and signing a bunch of papers to officially dub you a First Time Home OWNER!  We are here to educate, not sell you something.  Steve Howe, Realtor with the Minnesota Real Estate Team, and I will also talk about purchase agreements, the many down payment assistance programs and answer ANY questions you have. Ultimately, we hope you will leave the seminar with a greater understanding of buying a home.

If you’d like to attend, please call Cheryl (952-808-0042) or email her to get your name on the list.  Bring any questions you have so we can address those throughout the seminar or at the end.  We look forward to seeing you this week!

*This is NOT Homestretch.  Go to www.HOCMN.org to register for this 8-hour class.

With so many foreclosures in the marketplace, you are bound to purchase one.  Thing about foreclosures is the process can be a little trying.  There are a few reasons for this.  First, you’re dealing with a bank, so timeliness is not always a priority on their part.  You may not get a decision on your offer as quickly as you’d like.  Sometimes, banks will set a date purchase agreements are due requesting the “highest and best” offers.  This means they’re looking for multiple offers and in this instance, they may have originally priced the home lower than market to create this frenzy.  It is what it is and if it’s a home you want, you have to play by their rules.

Will this Close?

Another thing you can expect with a foreclosure is an “as-is” addendum.  This means that you are buying the house without a seller’s disclosure and in most instances, the bank won’t fix anything if there are any issues with your inspection or appraisal.  Oh, and speaking of inspections … just because it’s sold as-is does not mean you can’t get one or make your offer contingent on one.  It’s still highly recommended.  Let me give credit to some banks out there.  Some WILL do repairs which can be beneficial to you.  Also, just because it’s bank-owned doesn’t mean you can’t ask the bank to cover some or all of your costs.  A good Realtor will be able to advise you on this aspect of your purchase agreement.

The reason a bank completes an as-is addendum, is they have no knowledge of the home.  They’ve never lived there and I’d be shocked if anyone from the bank has even been to the house.  So, if there was previous water damage, storm damage or anything that may negatively affect the home, they won’t know about it.  Typically, there is no personal property offered in these deals.  For instance, if the kitchen still has the appliances, they cannot guarantee they will be in the home when it transfers to you.  If they happen to be there when you move in — woohoo — extra bonus!

When working with the banks on these foreclosures, you can expect, in most cases, that the bank will require you to close with a title company they have chosen.  The bank will run all their transactions through this title company for ease and for familiarity.  Typically, the bank will offer to pay your owner’s title policy.  So you know, the bank may require you to close with their chosen company, though by law, you technically CAN choose your own company.  I would highly recommend you get a solid recommendation from your agent or lender.  Many title companies will adjust their fees to compete with the bank’s company.  I deal with title companies all the time and I know who performs and who could use a little work.  Those that can use a little work are not all bad.  There may be delays in getting paperwork or closing scheduled, but it eventually gets done. 

Sometimes, it doesn’t.  Here’s what happened that should have never happened.  A recent transaction I had didn’t close on it’s desired close date and then didn’t close a week later.  It wasn’t the client’s fault.  It wasn’t due to financing — package and funds were there.  It wasn’t due to the Realtors not doing their job — they did all they could.  It ALL had to do with the title company.  This “title company” had no presence in MN.  The people were slow to answer emails and rarely answered phones.  They didn’t meet with clients, but sent a notary — very impersonal.  Not only that, the title work was “outsourced” which made matters worse.

Needless to say, we needed some paperwork, which took a few weeks to get after persistent emails and calls.  We needed the closing to be scheduled so we knew when to date the closing paperwork and the buyers knew when to be available — never was set.  Since we finally had the necessary paperwork, the agents and client set a date; we sent the package and wired funds.  It’s typical for the title company to provide a HUD to the lender for approval.  The HUD is the itemization of the settlement charges.  We spent the morning of the ”rescheduled” closing date burning the phones up to the closer, as well as emailing.  Nothing.  Right after lunch, we requested the wire be sent back since there was no response or HUD.  Low and behold … a response with a request to give them some time as they are working on the HUD.  That was it, the last communication.  I am not sure why an extra week wasn’t enough time.  Come Monday we still didn’t have the wire back. 

Seems pretty bad, huh?  It is unacceptable to have such poor communication.  In the 16 years I have originated loans, I have NEVER experienced such disregard to all the people involved.  If you think the above is bad … the following is worse.  The family moved from their apartment, had their lives in a truck, their kids hours away with family and no place to go expecting to close on the date set in the purchase agreement.   So, that week the buyers had to pay to store their stuff and live in a hotel, with many days of frustration and uncertainty.  Who wants to go through this?  They didn’t deserve this.  The day the funds were at the title company, we waited … and waited … and the return calls never happened nor did the HUD arrive.  The buyers moved on and are now renting month to month.  They had to, had to provide a home for their children and stop waiting for a closing that wasn’t happening.  Why?  Because a title company couldn’t get their ducks in a row, didn’t have the same customer-focus as the others involved and didn’t have the desire to make it happen.

How could this have been prevented?  Bucking the system with the bank and choosing their own title company.  Does this mean everything would have been rosy?  Not necessarily, but it would have meant familiarity by those who matter — the buyers, agents and mortgage company.  It would  have meant the personal touch of having a person to talk to, someone to depend on and someone to sit across from who knows the programs and can explain the paperwork — not just a notary to stamp after each signature — which is how they planned to handle the signing.  These people could have saved hundreds, not to mention all the time lost in work, on the phone and away from their children.  How do they get that back?  How can they be compensated for what they lost?  They can’t and that is a shame.

Working with the right people doesn’t just mean your Realtor and loan officer.  EVERYONE involved in the transaction needs to have the same goals in mind … YOUR goals in mind.  This obviously includes the title company.  As you can see, they can make or break a transaction — a preventable situation.  I am hopeful that this family can get their lives back in order and I truly hope they can trust again to take that magical step of owning their first home.  They actually gave the title company one more shot and … of course, they still didn’t close.   I pray homeownership happens, as everyone deserves to own a home and more importantly, everyone deserves to be treated fairly, like they matter and be given the common courtesy of great communication.

Believe me; I ask myself this daily.  You hear that you need 20% down to get financing or sterling credit.  And though these are GREAT attributes, they aren’t a guarantee that you will get a mortgage OR that you won’t have to go through a few hurdles.  It used to be so easy to get financing.  It wasn’t that we just handed money out to anyone, though there were people who did and look where that got us.  It’s not just them; it’s the lenders that accepted high risk buyers and did deals that should have never been done.  This is neither here nor there.  Right now, we need to focus on what the rules or guidelines are NOW, not what they used to be.  Those days are gone my friends.

Let’s start with the simplest issue I see today and the piece that has had the most changes — CREDIT.  Let’s talk about credit scores first.  Way back when, credit scores mattered; but they weren’t as much of a guage as they are now.  What I mean by that is we were able to create credit for people if they had lower scores or if they had NO scores.  It may have been acceptable to help someone who had lower scores, let’s say 560, if we could show clean credit on alternative sources such as insurance, utilities, rent, cell bills, etc — this is how we “created” credit.  And, if there was a clean credit history in the last 12 months, this deal could have probably worked.  Now, the line is drawn.  For the most part, you will need scores AND the middle of the 3 scores (most of us have a score from each bureau – Experian, Equifax and TransUnion) must be at least 620 or higher.  This is NOW.  I am guessing in the next few months, or sooner, most investors will be at 640, as some have already taken that leap.

Still referring to credit, you now need at least THREE tradelines (an item of credit on your credit report) AND they each must have 12 months’ history.  Plus, these lines need to be current.  Let’s say you haven’t done anything with your credit for a few years because you worked abroad.  You may have great credit scores because, before you left, you did a good job managing your credit.  Unfortunately, most, if not all, of your tradelines will be older in terms of the last active date.  This is one of the things that’s catching people and making it so they can’t get a loan.  It’s a shame really because you can tell they’re good at making payments and are responsible.  Thing is, the score isn’t a true representation of their credit since it doesn’t have current information reporting.  There is one exception to this rule, as of now.  The 3 main first time buyer programs, CityLiving, Dakota County Bond and MN Housing, in conjunction with an FHA loan, will allow less than 3 tradelines and less than the 12 month history.  If there is a score, it must still be over 620, however.  With the first time programs, we would work on creating credit and we WOULD need to find 3 items of credit to have added to our credit report — again, car insurance, utilities, layaway plans, healthclub memberships, utilities, etc., are all items we can use to create your history.  And by the way, this will NOT help your score as we do this on our credit report we pulled.  This does not get reported to the credit bureaus.

Another fun credit change that is COMING, and fast — Fannie Mae is requiring that lenders verify the borrower’s credit prior to closing.  It’s under the new Loan Quality Initiative.   Some Minnesota lenders have already put this in motion.  The interpretation of pulling credit prior to closing is within 48 hours of closing.  So, in my article, “Things Not to Do”, you learned that while in the loan process, don’t open new accounts or close accounts.  Well, this just became CRUCIAL to follow.  If you open a new account, just have a creditor check your credit for a possible new account, increase balances on what you owe, or anything … your approved, ready-to-go-to-closing loan could be un-approved.  For instance, the credit pull or increase in balances, could have dropped your score under what your approval requires.  Or, the new debt now makes it so your ratios are too high for qualifying.  If you want to deal with stress or the possibility of not closing on a home, then feel free to mess with your credit.  My advice is far different and will be quite bold.  If you want your loan to stay approved, DO NOT, under any circumstances, open new credit, consider opening new credit so your credit has to be pulled by another lender or increase your balances on your current debts.  This could make or break whether you close on your home or not.  There is no first time buyer exception to this either, so my advice stands in all circumstances — Just Don’t!

What else is making it hard to get financing?  How about qualifying ratios?  This is how a lender determines what you qualify for.  We use your gross monthly income and run some calculations.  In most cases, the “debt ratio” is the most common one for us to look at.  We want to make sure your new house payment PLUS all other obligations, does not exceed the program guidelines.  Essentially, for most loans, that means not spending more than 45% of your income toward the new housepayment and your other debts.  PMI companies (private mortgage insurance) have put their guidelines on this too.  Many PMI companies require a ratio of 41% or less.  Even though you may have an approval through an automated underwriting system, the PMI company could trump it and disapprove your loan due to excessive ratios.  I can remember the “days” when we saw ratios at 65%.  Now, was that a good underwriting decision?  Maybe, maybe not.  For an underwriter to make this call, the borrower must have excessive compensating factors, such as plenty of money left over after closing, good credit scores as well as good job stability.

This is a small sampling of the changes in the loan industry.  They are a few of the guideline changes that have impacted much of the business I do.  So, in answer to the blog’s title question … yes, many people can get loans.  No, you don’t need 20% down and sterling credit.  Fortunately, FHA is a great loan requiring only 3.5% down and more leniency with credit.  FHA also allows us to go a little higher in ratios and doesn’t limit us to the 45%.  I am not saying we can go over that just willy nilly.  That’s not the case.  We can go a little higher if, and only if, there are good compensating factors.  And I bet you didn’t know this (well, unless you read the blog), City Living and Dakota Bond programs ONLY allow FHA loans or VA, no conventional.  And don’t forget FHA and their guidelines in regards to disputed accounts.  This just adds another item on the checklist of things we have to watch for in order to make sure you can get approved for a loan.

Enough already, huh?  That’s all I have to say.  There are just too many variables that if it’s something YOU can control, you should.  You may want to check out our office blog titled Pain in the Assets – this goes over another important piece to your loan puzzle.  With all that can go wrong in the loan process now due to guideline changes, title issues or bank issues, we need all the humor we can get, so hopefully you like our article.  I’d love to do your loan right the first time by educating you BEFORE things become an issue.

Huh? What dispute? The one I am having with my roommate or with my parents about buying a home? You may have many disputes going on in your life. The one I am referring to is a dispute you started yesterday or 10 years ago with a creditor.

If you’ve been one to check your credit or maybe have had some issues in the past, you may have seen erroneous “tradelines” on your credit report.  A tradeline is an item of credit — car loan, credit card, mortgage, student loan,etc.  Now, if I were you I would be all over that like a bee to honey.  I’d contact the creditor and “dispute” the inaccurate information.  Wouldn’t you?  The whole goal is to get the right things reporting on your report, not items that don’t reflect your score and ability to pay on time.  True.  BUT one little catch.  Though you’re trying to BETTER your credit situation, you are actually making it harder to get financing.

Seriously?  Helping your credit/disputing an account = tough time getting a loan.  Tough to follow that logic,huh?  FHA is the most popular loan right now and the most lenient when it comes to credit scoring, as well as only requiring 3.5% down.  However, they have this little guideline that has been creating BIG issues for folks getting home loans.  The deal is, if you have disputed an account on your report, regardless of what the dispute consists of, your loan guidelines just got stricter.  Yes, your loan qualifications got tighter because you were trying to help your score improve.  Does that make sense?  Nope, not to me, but lately, many of the “rules” and changes have caused me to scratch my head quite often.

So, what changes with your underwriting guidelines?  For one, your loan must be manually underwritten.  90% of my loans are run through and approved through AUS (automated underwriting system).  Information about you in … decision on a loan for you out.  Slick and easy.  Your file is still processed, verified and still gets in front of an underwriter for the final stamp of approval.  In a manual underwrite, it doesn’t matter what the loan decision is through the AUS.  It’s no longer eligible for this to move to the underwriter faster and with more assurances of getting  your final approval.  It now has to be reviewed in depth and documented in depth in order for an underwriter to make a decision.

The rules to follow:

• Your ratios cannot exceed 31/43%.  This means you cannot spend over 31% of your GROSS monthly income toward your house payment, OR over 43% of your gross monthly income toward your house payment and other monthly debts.  This is concrete; no wiggle room here.  We will use the lesser payment for qualifying when choosing the payment you can be approved for.
• We must get traditional VOE’s and VOD’s (verification of employment and deposits)  So, even though you provided me with W2′s and paystubs, as well as bank statements, we must still get this information from a 3rd party.  No fun especially since some banks and some employers charge a fee to give us that information.  Unbelievable.
• We must do a VOR which is a verification of rent.  Important that we confirm you make rent payments on time.  Don’t worry if you’re not renting and with family; this won’t hurt your chances of getting a loan.
• The biggest one — you must have 2 months of reserves.  In layman’s terms, that means after closing, you need 2 months of your PITI payment leftover.  This can include retirement.  Here’s the thing.  Most first time buyers have a hard enough time coming up with their down payment or minimum investment depending on the first time program the buyer uses.  Now you’re saying we need money left over?  Yup and it hurts.

So how do you combat this?  Well, there may be a way to work on getting the dispute removed.  For instance, you could contact the creditor and tell them you don’t want to dispute the account any longer.  About 30 days after you call, we can re-pull credit to make sure the verbiage “account in dispute” has been removed.  It’s not an ideal situation, BUT, it would allow for a faster decision, more leniency on what you qualify for and NO requirement to have money leftover after you close, though there is nothing wrong with that!

The moral of this story — don’t wait to find a house to make an offer to find out you might have to wait due to this rule.  Make sure you’re getting pre-approved with a lender that knows these guidelines and looks for them when reviewing your report.  Also, there are people I can refer you to with regard to credit restoration if you’re in that boat.  Let me help you get ready for the biggest purchase of your life.  Knowledge is power and the more you know and can prepare for now will save a lot of headaches and stress when you do buy.  I think you’ll have enough of that just from doing something new!

Where have ethics and morals gone in America?  This is certainly a generalization as I know most of you reading this DO have ethics and a good moral compass.  But then there are those people who don’t.  Those people who “stated” income to get into a loan WAY above their means.  Those people who falsified bank statements or W2s or even took another person’s social security number to get a loan.  Those LOAN OFFICERS that suggested these things, suggested doing a 2-year ARM because they can sell in a few  years, suggested the amount of income the borrower “needs” to qualify or suggested a way around the system.  Now, due to this, we’re required to be licensed.   Woohoo … I am sure that will stop people from advising inappropriately.  And speaking of licenses, I officially passed the national exam — so be assured, I am “allowed” to originate loans.  Gosh, I hope so after 16 years of doing this   By the way, this is a long time coming and something I have supported.  Stock brokers are licensed, as are Realtors.  Why we haven’t been is beyond me. 

Did I do stated income loans?  Sure, I did a handful of them — literally less than five.  That’s a very small amount.  Did the people I work with falsify anything?  I have no idea and don’t care to know.  In the instances I can remember, I dealt with self-employed people who made WAY more than what they did on paper, ie federal taxes.  The nice benefit of being self-employed is the write-offs.  As lenders, we appear to penalize them for this.  To some extent we do, but if you tell the IRS you’re making $40K after expenses, but you brought in $100K, then that’s the income — $40K.  It’s a catch-22 for people who are self-employed.  That’s why a stated income program worked.  They’re now illegal in Minnesota and I would be hard-pressed to find a lender willing to do one.  And I get it.  Too many loan officers “coached” their clients.  It’s wrong and it’s caused a world of hurt for the rest of us.

So here we are, in a huge financial crisis and the government is helping people in the above situations “modify” their loans so they can stay in their home.  Don’t get me wrong.  There are thousands of people who were “duped” into certain loan programs with the promise that their credit will improve in 2 years and they could refinance.  This would have been sound advice if the market didn’t tank and values of homes hadn’t dropped.  Now, these people can’t refi AND now can’t make a payment that has possibly doubled.  How can you blame them?  They were told about the best case scenario.  This bugs me, as you can see. 

I am a worry wart — don’t want people upset at me or to come back and say “you told me” and have them in a tizzy over advice I gave.  A few years ago it was practically a requirement to buy a new home NOT contingent on the sale of your old home.  As lenders, we had to count the debt of the OLD house and the NEW house for qualifying.  This makes sense.  But, reality is, how long can someone make 2 house payments?  At some point, just giving up on the old house is easier to do if times get tough.  Heck, it’s not the roof over their heads now.  They still have a place to call home.  I was very upfront with buyers about the potential hazards of doing this.  Ultimately, it’s the buyer’s decision, but I lay it out there — the good, bad and ugly.  And speaking of ugly … in “those” days, if you had a signed lease agreement, you had income we could use to offset the old house payment.  I did a loan where I was given 2 leases for a duplex the borrower owned.  We followed guidelines and used 75% of the rent for qualifying so he and his fiance could move into their new home.  These kids were referred to me by a friend — a loan officer friend that had knowledge of their intent to let the house go.  I found this out about a year later.  To this day, I have no idea if the leases were legit and the renters finally decided to move.  Not a clue.  And I just don’t want to know. 

It’s disturbing to me that I had a part in a loan like that.  I didn’t have the knowledge of the end result, but it makes me feel icky inside that I trusted.  And as my husband will tell you, I trust a little too easy.  It’s my nature to assume you’re being honest unless I see or suspect differently.  Had I known their intention for letting the house go … I would not have done the loan.  My conscience would not have let me.  It’s funny, but we have a disclosure, required by the federal government, that states mortgage fraud is bad, prosecutable to the tune of 30 years in jail and/or one million dollars.  So, what’s funny about that?  The fact we have to “tell” people fraud is bad and not only that, people will still commit it — doesn’t matter if they sign a piece of paper warning them of the consequences.  Unbelievable.

So the moral dilemma as I see it — should we pay our mortgages on time, like we’re supposed to or do we get help from the government for NOT paying them on time?  Hmmmm, reinforcing  and going as far as rewarding bad behavior.  I don’t get it.  Here’s an article that speaks to this too.  I’m not the only one in this conundrum.  And here’s what’s really sad.  Over 50% of those people that modified their loans have already defaulted.  Oh yippee.  That means the government helped subsidize the rate to make the numbers work, paid the lenders a fee to do these types of loans and offer the client a cherry rate.  And what for?

My soapbox is getting slippery and I know views like this shouldn’t be put in blogs, but I feel so strongly about this, about the way the government has handled the misguided, misrepresented and possibly fraudulent buyers that are getting a pat on the back for going against what’s right – disregarding their debts.  As a landlord of a rental unit (used to have two), I am amazed and shocked how many of our tenants pay late or not at all and expected us to deal with it.  How dare us assess a late fee, blatantly addressed in the lease.  When I rented, I paid my rent.  If I didn’t, I was kicked out.  It was that simple.  I was taught that paying what you owe is honorable, ethical and the right thing to do.  It’s how I was raised.  It’s how I will raise my children and how I will continue to advise my clients.  Because these are the right things to do — no moral dilemma on this front.

As you may know, once or twice a month I’m part of the MN Real Estate Show on KTLK 100.3 FM with the MN Real Estate Team and WE Team .  Our team, MN Home Loan Partners, has been a part of these awesome teams for over 4 years. 

The show is a great way for you to learn about the current marketplace, where rates are at and even call in to ask your questions.  Though we plan to discuss “To-Don’ts” and “Vested Interest — What’s in it for Whom after the Dust Settles” today, it’s really your calls that make the show what it is.  We are more than happy to get off topic or never even hit the topic to take calls.  Our number is 800-396-0406.

Hope you can join the guys, Ryan and Scott, Kelly (our fabulous host) and me for an hour of real estate and mortgage talk. 

Have a super weekend and for all you Mom’s out there — Happy Mother’s Day!!!