Is PMI Really That Bad?
Thursday, July 21st, 2011Did you hear about AIG being bailed out by the government? Okay, this is really old news; but it reminds us of the “horrible” acronym tied to some conventional loans … PMI. I’m hear to tell you that this three-letter word isn’t such a bad thing.
Private Mortgage Insurance, known as PMI, is just that, insurance. It’s not insurance you “choose” to purchase or shop around for and it isn’t
coverage for you or for making payments on your mortgage in case you die. It’s insurance for the lender/investor to protect their investment — your loan — in case you default. On conventional loans, PMI is required, in most cases, if you have a down payment of less than 20%. I say “most cases” because some lenders will do financing without PMI, but there is typically an interest rate premium paid for avoiding this.
For most, PMI respresents a portion of your PITI payment (Principal, Interest, Taxes and Insurance (both homeowner’s and PMI). There are other options though, such as LPMI, which is Lender-Paid Mortgage Insurance. The rate is usually higher to cover the premium so you don’t have PMI in your payment. There is also BPMI – Borrower-Paid Mortgage Insurance. In this scenario, the borrower pays for the upfront amount at closing. This is also done to avoid having PMI as part of the house payment. Either way, PMI is being purchased to cover this loss.
And so you know, PMI doesn’t cover the whole loss. Coverage requirements are dictated by your down payment amount. According to Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac guidelines, if you had 15% down, the coverage would be around 12% of the loan. Alternatively, if the down payment is less, like 5% down, the coverage requirement will increase to 25-30%. For example, if the loan is $100,000 with 5% down, you would be required to have 25% coverage or $25,000. In case of default, the PMI company pays the lender $25,000. That’s a lot of money. No wonder AIG took a fall, or a few. They were one of the PMI companies that chose to insure higher risk loans — and I’m not talking about less down loans, but those that had other risks as well, such as lower credit scores or recent major derogatory items like bankruptcy.
But you’re a good risk, make your payments on time — why are you being penalized for the bad eggs? Valid question, but it all plays into historical data. And history shows that people with less down payment are more likely to default. When you have “less skin in the game” and things go South, you’re more apt to walk away than try to salvage the equity you have. I equate this to car insurance. If you’re male and 21, you’re car insurance is higher than a 21-year old female. Why? They have more accidents, thus, a higher risk. So, the premiums are higher. And insurance is all about risk.
So why would PMI be a good thing? I have a few reasons, kindly provided by MGIC, one of the PMI companies we use. All of the companies that provide this type of insurance offer similar rates, but they may have different guidelines or requirements that make one better than the other.
- It’s affordable. Okay, so why is this a good reason? Recently, FHA increased their monthly mortgage insurance premiums, making them 1 1/2-2x higher than conventional. And, they charge an upfront premium that’s rolled into your loan. This is not to say FHA isn’t a good loan. More, it may make more sense to use conventinonal financing if you have the credit to do so. Most people use FHA due to lower scores (doesn’t equate to “bad”) , like under 660.
- It’s not forever. Not the best argument because FHA mortgage insurance isn’t either. BUT, as long as you pay the PMI for two years, have on-time mortgage payments AND can show you have 20% equity via a new appraisal, you can discontinue it. FHA, on the other hand, requires you to have the mortgage insurance for at least five years and you must have 22% equity of the ORIGINAL PURCHASE PRICE, which doesn’t take into account appreciation.
Oh, and another way to avoid PMI altogether is to do a “piggy-back” loan or second loan. You would put 10% down, get a second loan for your other 10%, which would make up your 20% down, thus avoiding the PMI. Your payment would be a little less than having PMI, but there are other challenges getting the second loan. Doable, but not for everyone.
Nutshell — PMI isn’t all bad. If it weren’t for PMI, we couldn’t do 3% down — or less than 20% for that matter. Do you have that much saved? I don’t and that’s another blog for another day.



